Gonzalez Rolon Valdespino & Rodriguez, LLC, Attorneys

June 2006

International Trade Law Alert

In this edition:

CBP to C-TPAT Participants: Use New Portal, or Else!

Introducing Tom Pifer, GRVR's Newest Attorney

Are the X-Men Human. The Trade Community Demands an Answer

Texas Sees Spate of Export Violators

Avoiding the Gasoline Blues -- Training Employees While Cutting Travel

The Supreme Court and Whistleblowers - Companies Must Still Worry

Do-Gooder Corner: Project HOPE

Calendar of Events

Contact GRVR Attorneys

CBP to C-TPAT Participants: Use New Portal, or Else!

CTPATLogo1Signaling perhaps the biggest change in the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) launched a web portal for all current and future C-TPAT participants (i.e., you) to keep all C-TPAT related security data and to report any changes to CBP.

However, the web portal is more than a reporting device. The portal creates new obligations. The first obligation is for all current C-TPAT partners to start using the web portal before a certain date: August 1, 2006 for importers and carriers and September 1, 2006 for brokers, NVOCCs/forwarders/consolidators. Miss the deadline and CBP kicks you out of C-TPAT.

Second, a participant is required to check its Security Profile at least once a year and either certify to its continued accuracy or update the Security Profile as needed.

Third, verified companies are actually expected to do something. Before this web portal existed, companies that survived a verification visit from CBP were pretty much home free. CBP admonished verified companies to keep up the good work, but there was no enforcement mechanism.

Companies who were certified and verified early in history of C-TPAT are suddenly facing the discomfiting truth that they may no longer qualify for C-TPAT. CBP has toughened (“clarified”, CBP might insist) the security guidelines over the past couple of years. If a company has not taken the effort to comport with the heightened standards, disqualification is possible.

It is clear that CBP has used a large chunk of the funds Congress appropriate to C-TPAT on the web portal. The web portal offers plenty of bells and whistles, like allowing you to communicate directly with CBP in real time. CBP also seems to have taken security seriously. The web portal uses advanced encryption technology. CBP also provides FAQ and instructions, in the form of a PowerPoint, for using the web portal.

C-TPAT is all grown-up. The web portal is an impressive feat.
 

Introducing Tom Pifer, GRVR's Newest Attorney

GRVR Attorneys is giddy about its newest attorney. You should be, too. He is a wonderful writer and tireless advocate. He also has a wealth of trade experience on the business side of importing and exporting. But, why don’t we let him introduce himself:

I am pleased to have this opportunity to introduce myself as the latest addition to the GRVR team. I was fortunate enough to recently receive the offer of an attorney position with GRVR and accepted eagerly. As a recent law school graduate, I am very appreciative of the opportunity to work in a firm with the degree of expertise in international trade law possessed by GRVR. It is my sincere hope that my eighteen years experience in international business transactions and four years experience as a licensed customs broker prove useful to you, GRVR’s clientele, in addressing your legal needs. While my interests in international trade law are broadly based, I have particular background in international contract negotiations, letters of credit, transportation, and C-TPAT. I look forward to contributing to the high level of professionalism and effective counsel that has become synonymous with GRVR services.-- Tom Pifer.
 

Ask the Attorney

Question:

We wish to sue a Mexican Company in the United States, but it will be difficult to serve them in the United States even though they sometimes do business here. How can we serve them in Mexico?

Answer:

It may be possible to sue a Mexican defendant in the United States and then have a Mexican Government Official serve them in Mexico. The U.S. and Mexico are parties to a convention (i.e., a treaty) that allows for this using a letter of rogatory. It takes careful planning to shepherd the lawsuit though the domestic court and clerk’s office, the Secretary of State (for the apostille), the U.S. Central Authority and the Mexican Central Authority. If you factor in the issue of language and the delay (it can take up to a year to serve the defendant), it is easy to see why the process is not widely utilized. Serving the defendant in this manner requires a certain level of experience and a legal presence on both sides of the border.

With offices in the USA and Mexico City, GRVR Attorneys is such a firm. Call us to find out how we can help you Do Business in Mexico.

Are the X-Men Human? The Trade Community Demands an Answer

item7aX-Men III blazed to a record-setting pace during Memorial Day weekend. A blockbuster by any measure, this movie poses a multitude of ethical questions endemic to the modern era. How do we treat those who are different from us? Is there life after death? What is the Government’s role in protecting us against “the other”?

While these questions resonate with the public, there is one question that has particular relevance to importers: Are the X-Men human?

The question is not academic, but was actually litigated, in a fashion, before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

In Toy Biz vs U.S (January 2003), the U.S. Court of International Trade decided the tariff classification of X-Men, Spider Man, and the Fantastic Four actions figures. U.S. Customs thought the action figures should be classified as dolls, while Toy Biz, the importer, argued that the proper classification was “other toys.” To qualify as a “doll”, an item must represent only a human being. Thus, the Court had to decide the humanity of the X-Men.

The importer argued that action figures were not human beings, pointing to the “tentacles, claws, wings or other non-human features.” (could be describing a former law partner -- editor). Customs retorted that the action figures were as human as you and I because they had a head, mouth, eyes, nose, hair, arms, torso, breasts, muscles, and (with one exception) legs and feet.

Perhaps imbuing the issue with unwarranted dignity, or perhaps presaging a time when such things will actually be litigated by real mutants, the Court took on the issue with gusto and deliberation, burrowing through levels of legislative history and invoking the tools of statutory interpretation.

Ultimately, the Court decided that, no, the X-Men are not humans and, ergo, cannot be considered dolls.

The decision caused a stir among fans who have never strayed from the belief that having retractable titanium claws only makes one special, not different.

The question now is: Will the Evil Magneto summon like-minded mutants to take arms up against their human oppressors to avenge this ultimate insult? Or will the parties instead settle pending appeal because of the high costs of continued litigation?

Perhaps X-Men IV will reveal the ultimate truth.

Next issue: Superman claims blue suits from Krypton not subject to quota.
 

Texas Sees Spate of Export Violations

item11It should be no secret that enforcement officials have long targeted Texas companies for violating export and import laws. Through our offices in Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, our law firm sees and services the need daily. Texas is a hotbed of industry and international trade and federal enforcement officials have beefed up their presence here. The state has seen high profile cases involving criminal misconduct. However, even through we are home to the Enron and other high profile trials, we are still surprised by the number of export penalty cases from our area.

Here is a sampling:

UGS Corporation of Plano, Texas agreed to pay a $57,750 civil penalty to settle allegations that it engaged in illegal exports of computer software or software updates to organizations in India and China and allowed downloads of software in China and India.

Dresser Inc. of Addison, Texas agreed to pay a penalty in the amount of $110,000 for allegedly shipping oil industry items to Libya and Iran in violation of OFAC prohibitions. Dresser Inc. of Addison, Texas also paid $6,000 for an alleged unauthorized shipment to Iraq.

Plains All American Pipeline of Houston Texas agreed to pay a penalty in the amount of $82,500 for alleged unauthorized export of crude oil to Canada.

Salinas International Freight Company of Dallas, Texas agreed to pay a penalty in the amount of $11,600 for allegedly shipping to a denied party.

The Ghashim Group of Houston, Texas has its export privileges suspended for allegedly shipping computers to Syria.
 

Avoiding the Gasoline Blues: Training Employees While Cutting Travel

item10With gasoline prices in the stratosphere, companies are naturally cutting back on travel. The tendency is to also to cut back on compliance training.

Export and import compliance training does not have to suffer.

Through our online training, not only do you not spend any money on transportation, but you allow your employees to decide the pace of their learning and to reinforce lessons through quizzes and tests. GRVR Attorneys and the Export Import Law Institute also allow your company to tailor training to fit your company’s policies. You can even monitor employee participation.

Contact us to find out more.
 

The Supreme Court and Whistleblowers - Companies Still Must Worry

item12What effects does the recent U.S. Supreme Court whisteblower opinion have on importers and exporters?

On May 30, 2006, the U.S. Supreme Court rendered an opinion in Garcetti v. Ceballos. The 5-4 decision is relevant to the 1st Amendment rights and protections of approximately 20 million public sector workers at the federal, state, and local level. While it curtailed the protections of public employees, it has little, if any, impact on whistleblowers in private companies and corporations.

Federal enforcement officials rely heavily on whistleblowers within the company or from competitors. Under federal statutory law, these whistleblowers are rewarded financially for turning you in. These laws are undiminished by Garcetti v. Ceballos. Whistleblowers can also be anonymous. They are also protected from any retaliation. Thus, a company violating an export or import law not only has to deal with an export or import violation, but can be hit again with a whistleblower violation that can dwarf the administrative penalty and can even result in a prison term.


Do-Gooder Corner - Project HOPE

item13Indonesia has been hit with a 6.3 magnitude earthquake. Thousands are dead and injured and hundreds of thousands are displaced. See story.

In very un-FEMA fashion, some wonderful groups have rushed in to help. One of our favorites is Project HOPE. According to Project HOPE’s website:

The death toll from the earthquake that struck Indonesia over the weekend is 4,600...and climbing, as rescuers clear the rubble and search for survivors. Project HOPE staff have been working in Indonesia since shortly after the December 2004 tsunami. Today, they are providing on-the-ground situation reports, as we prepare to respond. Project HOPE is urgently appealing for help.

For a country that suffered such overwhelming devastation and loss of lives from the tsunami, having to face another large-scale natural disaster 17 months later seems unimaginable. Project HOPE has been working these past months to help Indonesians rebuild their lives and reestablish basic health care. Saturday's powerful earthquake presents a huge new challenge, but one to which we must respond.

The latest communication reports that, in addition to the thousands of deaths, tens of thousands were injured by the quake, and as many as 200,000 were displaced. Local hospitals are overwhelmed. In these first hours, basic needs such as food and clean water, clothing and shelter are the focus. We know from experience that the health and medical needs will be known very soon -- and with your help, we will be in a position to respond.

Our hearts are with the people who had little to begin with, and have now lost homes and family members. Please let them know that they will not be forgotten by supporting Project HOPE's humanitarian work in Indonesia, with as generous a donation as possible.

Calendar of Events - Summer

item14

Focused Assessments and the Importer Self-Assessment (ISA) Program -
Strategies and Opportunities for Importers
Power Lunch - Free
June 8, 2006 (Thursday), 12 noon- 1 pm, Irving, Texas
Registration - There is no charge for this seminar. A complimentary box lunch will be provided. We will email the address and location to confirmed registrants. The location will be in Irving, Texas. Registration - To reserve a seat, call 214.270.7220 or email info@exportimportlaw.com.

Export Compliance Made Simple Webinar
Complying with the Export Administration Regulations
June 22, 2006 (Thursday)
10:30 am - 11:30 am Central
Registration - $99 per connection. Watch the slide presentation on the Internet and listen to the instructor on your phone. Receive a free copy of our popular "Export Penalties - Stairway to Hell" poster. To reserve a spot, call 214.270.7220 or email info@exportimportlaw.com.

Handling Compliance Emergencies
Fines, Penalties, Forfeitures, and Seizures
Power Lunch - Free
July 6, 2006 (Thursday), 12 noon- 1 pm, Irving, Texas
Registration - There is no charge for this seminar. A complimentary box lunch will be provided. We will email the address and location to confirmed registrants. The location will be in Irving, Texas. Registration - To reserve a seat, call 214.270.7220 or email info@exportimportlaw.com

Foreign Trade Zones Webinar
August 9, 2006 (Wednesday)
10:30 am - 11:30 am Central
Registration - There is no charge for this seminar. Watch the slide presentation on the Internet and listen to the instructor on your phone. To reserve a spot, call 214.270.7220 or email info@exportimportlaw.com


Contact GRVR Attorneys
Dallas • Houston • San Antonio • Brazil • Mexico City

Main Physical Address:

Park Place Center, Suite 300
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd
Dallas, Texas  75219

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 131587
Dallas, TX  75313
Phone: 214.720.7720

Email: info@exportimportlaw.com
Web: www.exportimportlaw.com

Disclaimer

You will  not find any legal advice anywhere in this newsletter, on our website, or in any course or public lesson we offer. If you would like legal advice, you need to ask your attorney. GRVR Attorneys provide legal advice only to existing clients in a confidential and private setting, not in public (i.e., not in a newsletter). If you are looking to hire an international trade attorney, we would love to hear from you. The GRVR Attorney responsible for the contents of this newsletter is Oscar Gonzalez. He can be reached at 214.720.7720 or info@exportimportlaw.com.